okay, they've got me
Feb. 17th, 2004 10:35 amAs I was telling
queerbychoice, I found it hard to maintain my usual "marriage-schmarriage" attitude when I heard about Del & Phyllis, who apparently didn't particularly care whether they were married but were just doing it for the young people, who'd asked 'em. I mean, how can you not be just a little touched by this?:
And now I'm hearing tales of the camping out at the courthouse and looking at pix at this site and, no, I still don't think relationship status ought to convey any benefits in taxes, insurance, inheritance, etc., but I am touched nonetheless. All those folx standing up for their love. Makes me wish I were in SF just to suck up some of the energy.
But maybe it's just my own heartsickness. Or maybe I'm just hormonal. Right?
And now I'm hearing tales of the camping out at the courthouse and looking at pix at this site and, no, I still don't think relationship status ought to convey any benefits in taxes, insurance, inheritance, etc., but I am touched nonetheless. All those folx standing up for their love. Makes me wish I were in SF just to suck up some of the energy.
But maybe it's just my own heartsickness. Or maybe I'm just hormonal. Right?
Re:
Date: Feb. 17th, 2004 06:10 pm (UTC)Of course you make some good points. Know what's still a hang-up for me, though? When dykes refer to the "wife." And, yeah, it feels worse to me when it's a butch-y partner of a femme-y woman using the term. That servile property connotation is too ingrained in the word, at least to me.
On the other hand, I had to agree with a friend who said she thinks lesbians should use the high-commitment word "married" more in, and sooner into, our often-very-codependent living situations, just to admit what a comingling is going on. It annoys her when we bring the U-Haul on the second date and then say "Well it's not like we're married or anything."