($$, that is.) (or maybe i should say imaginary $$, $$ of the conjectural chosen focus.)
CarrieP at Big Fat Blog sends us to a new Paul Campos interview at the Atlantic. She points out that the comment thread there is unusually thoughtful, compared to what often follows "obesity" pieces online. I haven't gotten that far with it yet myself, but I'm liking the interview, in bits and pieces today.
CarrieP at Big Fat Blog sends us to a new Paul Campos interview at the Atlantic. She points out that the comment thread there is unusually thoughtful, compared to what often follows "obesity" pieces online. I haven't gotten that far with it yet myself, but I'm liking the interview, in bits and pieces today.
Re: here's the bit, amy/cohost/kessler
Date: Aug. 4th, 2009 07:04 pm (UTC)fat people have such extensive experience of "health" used as a weapon against us, used in discourse that scapegoats us and truly contributes to our oppression. the kind of skepticism you exhibit, which is perhaps encouraged in people encountering/entertaining campos, is our friend, in that struggle. many of us struggle, as do many not-fat people, with what and how to eat, and how to cope with psychological issues there, along with a slew of others, but the damage done to us by the war on obesity, and our struggle with that, gets way too little attention. even something like evidence along the lines of "diets don't work" gets co-opted by the diet industry. and pharma is a scarier foe than the weight loss biz. a goliath. we need all the davids and slingshots we can round up.
just by asking that question, amy let loose one little rock.
i just got a phone call from a fat kid who's upset. not about fat, just now....
Re: here's the bit, amy/cohost/kessler
Date: Aug. 5th, 2009 03:06 pm (UTC)yeah but...i'm getting that sick grad school feeling, with thoughts of "interrogating" as the ultimate goal. a cultural critic can tell me many things, but he/she can't tell me whether there's a link between weight and type II diabetes. i mean, i understand how the premises of debate get set and how the premises can be wrong. but if i had my mother back for example i wouldn't not sweat this possible link because i note propaganda when i see it. because there's an obesity myth, and diets don't work, i wouldn't say to a loved one--oh that's all bullshit. i'd want to sort through the various angles--and agendas--and try to figure out what's true. and if "fat acceptance" has to extend to the food industry, no thanks. i think they do make us all more unhealthy. and i do believe in what kessler calls "conditioned hypereating," etc.
(i'll do anything not to work!)
Re: here's the bit, amy/cohost/kessler
Date: Aug. 5th, 2009 04:12 pm (UTC)i do think the academic-ish tearing apart (or interrogating or dismantling or pick-your-fashion-word) of unexamined or insufficiently examined cultural practices can have quite real real-world effects. and is worthwhile. if often tedious and irritating and self-congratulatory and a lot of other objectionable/irritating things.