fflo: (Default)
[personal profile] fflo
Cat people are talking to me of cat things. This is good.

In a related (to the last sentence) matter, I am increasingly able, after a few years at Math Reviews, not only to tolerate but even to use, willy-nilly & with little wincing, demonstrative pronouns. That is to say, I am less compelled to make 'em adjectival by plopping directive nouns after 'em---though I still believe, fairly firmly, that that [habit] generally makes for better writing.

This [development], I realize, likely interests no one but me.

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madush69.livejournal.com
Cat people are the bomb!! Join [livejournal.com profile] kittypics It's a blast.

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
I check it out sometimes---thanks to you, it's on my friends-of-friends page. But I have slow dial-up at home, so to have it as a regular part of my own friends page can slog things up.

Or are things slogged down.

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 09:19 pm (UTC)
groovesinorbit: (Default)
From: [personal profile] groovesinorbit
Cat people and cat things. Good stuff.

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
How do you feel about cat suits? Cat acombs?

Date: Mar. 12th, 2005 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madush69.livejournal.com
"Yo, Dawg!

Date: Mar. 11th, 2005 01:59 am (UTC)
groovesinorbit: (Default)
From: [personal profile] groovesinorbit
Cat acombs are cool. Cat suits are overdone nowadays, I think. But back in the day of Eartha Kitt and, Julie Newmar, and Lee Meriwether? Rowr!

Date: Mar. 11th, 2005 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
Eartha was the best Catwoman, by far. She was actually feliny assertive, unlike Julie Newmar---whom I liked and all, but her whole wanting Batman and being a figure of vulnerability/sympathy---wtf is that? this is a villian!

Date: Mar. 11th, 2005 04:58 pm (UTC)
groovesinorbit: (Default)
From: [personal profile] groovesinorbit
wtf is that?

It was the '60s. Why didn't Sam kill Darrin? Why the hell did Zsa Zsa leave NY to go to the sticks when she hated it?

Viva la Revolucion!

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vjsmom.livejournal.com
This development is of great interest to me. I am still compelled, for the most part, to insert the directive noun.

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 09:56 pm (UTC)
paperkingdoms: (Default)
From: [personal profile] paperkingdoms
I hadn't realized demonstrative pronouns was a particularly mathy thing. I mean, I use them. Without any wincing at all. But still... interesting.

And yay for cats!
(deleted comment)

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
I like 'em in your off-hand colloquial stuff. E.g., "Is that all there is?" (song in my head now) "What's this?" "that is to say" stuff like that there

Date: Mar. 10th, 2005 11:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anderyn.livejournal.com
Hee. I find that mathematical writing often makes me wonder if I've lost any sense of style at all.

demo pronouns and such

Date: Mar. 12th, 2005 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sprig5.livejournal.com
I used to mark instances of use of demonstrative pronouns w/o directive nouns on my freshman students' papers all the time...without knowing what demonstrative pronouns or directive nouns were. I would constantly be writing: "What does 'that' refer to? Unclear." Or "What does 'it' refer to?" What would THAT be called, by the way? (That sort of use of 'it,' I mean.)

May or may not have a contract on a house this AM. Will find out today. Sellers "are inclined" to accept my offer, but that doesn't mean they;ve signed anything yet.

Re: demo pronouns and such

Date: Mar. 12th, 2005 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
Well, "it"'s a pronoun. A proper one, really---a word that substitutes for and refers back to a noun, which, when referred back to, is its antecedent. So the vague "it" is the problem of unclear (or unstated) antecedent. In really solid grammatical writing, there has to be an actual present, stated noun, not to far before & not ambiguously on the other side of other possible referents, that the pronoun refers to---or stands in for.

I think there's a bastardized quality to demonstratives when used as pronouns. They're not really designed for that linguistic purpose. It's an instinctive/built-in take I've had since I was fairly young & learned later to discuss in grammatical terms. The main shame of 'em, to me, is the missed opportunity to be clear, and possible even give a "spin" one is after.

Yeah, call me controlling---writing is controlling, of the audience's experience. Directive. Stuff one doesn't want to do as a matter of course in interpersonal relationships, but one does rather want to do when attempting to articulate ideas, or take a reader someplace with words.

The classic issue with pronouns, which I imagine you were explaining to the young'ns in some detail, is pronoun-antecedent agreement, in gender & number & case. If I hadn't taken Latin I wouldn't have learned about that [business] at all, formally, until tutoring students at the community college who were taking ridiculously detailed formal grammar quizzes from this bizarrely out-of-touch fella.

Keep me posted on the house.
fflo: (Default)
fflo

Hello.

CURRENTLY FEATURING
the
Postcard of the Day

(a feature involving a postcard on a day)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For another postcard thing, see
my old postcard poems tumblr or
its handy archive.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I'm currently double-posting here & at livejournal. Add me and let me know who you are, and we can read each other's protected posts.

======================

"What was once thought cannot be unthought."

-- Möbius, The Physicists

=======================

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 1516171819 20
212223242526 27
28293031   
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 04:03 pm