the truncated version
Sep. 13th, 2006 11:35 amDidja ever hear tell that at one point Marianne Moore, in her varyingly-long versions of "Poetry," thought maybe it should stop after not just the first 4 lines, but only the first part of the first line---
I, too, dislike it.
? I think I heard that some time. Anyway the idea's been coming back to me recently, as the title I've had in my head has had more than one poem (or beginning of poem, anyway) attached to it in these past coupla weeks, but all that's sticking is the first line. Should it stop there, I ask myself (and now the poetry people among ya), or could the struggle to flesh it out be worthwhile? It's such an aesthetic minefield, its milieu all heavy/Big. (I like to think I could keep it from the maudlin/mawkish, trite, general/Big, but I might be kidding myself about that.) Here 'tis:
Valediction, Overdue
Finally, it's just a town
("Scrap the whole thing" is certainly also a suggestion I'd not be offended by.)
I, too, dislike it.
? I think I heard that some time. Anyway the idea's been coming back to me recently, as the title I've had in my head has had more than one poem (or beginning of poem, anyway) attached to it in these past coupla weeks, but all that's sticking is the first line. Should it stop there, I ask myself (and now the poetry people among ya), or could the struggle to flesh it out be worthwhile? It's such an aesthetic minefield, its milieu all heavy/Big. (I like to think I could keep it from the maudlin/mawkish, trite, general/Big, but I might be kidding myself about that.) Here 'tis:
Valediction, Overdue
Finally, it's just a town
("Scrap the whole thing" is certainly also a suggestion I'd not be offended by.)
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 05:15 pm (UTC)i think there's some element of temporal and logical buildup in here, so i can't tell exactly if there's a priority for either or what.
not to argue with the premise and the exigence, but i wonder if 'just' will sustain the project for very long :). speaking from personal experience (in which no town ever went back to 'just').
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 05:25 pm (UTC)'just' doesn't hold both its 2 main takes in this case, which is not so much a shame as maybe a reason not to pick/use it, if i'm bein' brief/pregnant.
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 06:47 pm (UTC)ach, i know not how to talk of these shades
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 06:50 pm (UTC)"now" has sometimes opened the next line--- the now of the implied "now that" with a "you're" next...
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 07:34 pm (UTC)[am handling my own poetic issues at the moment:]
no subject
Date: Sep. 13th, 2006 06:51 pm (UTC)hmmmm