![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ffloPoincar\'e unramified Brauer monoids monoid semisphere submonoid Grassmannian Cartan Frenkel Kac Drinfeld subalgebras nilpotence Sylow homocentric birational resolvents Nevanlinna Ph.D Grassmannians cprime KdV Zigmund Izdat eigensolutions ultralong intertropical equatorward orthogonalization Darboux Favard Zygmund toric monoidal epimorphisms ultrafilter Zbl countercyclically transversal arclength nanotubes adequation Elrod reals Chebyshev Gottlieb Seiberg Witten Weyl Kontsevich's endgathered nonisometric conformally Kolmogorov hypersurface threefolds nontoric Calabi Yau Gromov comultiplication braidings coquasitriangular Mellin Polya minimizers Birkh\"auser Probab isometries nuclearity varphi nonhomogeneous Conf Scuola subsetneqq gigabit piezoelectricity unsymmetric eigenrelation pseudometrics nondegenerate nonperturbative equational bisimulation bisimilarity micropolar microstructure obtention symmetrizations Villars infimum Painlev\'e supermedian semiregular Injectivity projectivity Grothendieck complexified tricyclic vortices Ricci Coxeter Frobenius compactification homeomorphs nilmanifolds solvmanifolds nilmanifold genericity Teichm\"uller Carath\'eodory partitioner distortionary Calvo multifunctions multicast hemimorphism hemimorphic reconstructible supercuspidal superquintessence Hamiltonians accreting unicyclic bialgebra comodule unorthodoxly formul\ae unknotting decoherence dispersionless wavefunctions detuning Hermitian pseudosuperalgebra pseudosupersymmetry pseudosuperpartner pseudosuperpartners Quasirelativistic unimodal bimodality
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: complexified tricyclic vortices
Date: Sep. 6th, 2005 04:57 pm (UTC)Frobenius compactification homeomorphs for dinner, again?
Date: Sep. 6th, 2005 10:53 pm (UTC)I hope they don't get unorthodoxly zapped by an gigabit of unknotting piezoelectricity, detuning them into a superquintessence of dispersionless epimorphisms.
Yikes, maybe _that's_ why me wee nipples got hard all of a sudden. I've already had my remarkable coincidence of the day* at work, so imagine coming home and running smack into an apparent reference to my favorite Unified Field Conspiracy Theory, the venerable Montauk Project.
*Casual conversation with an out-of-state customer at the (big, used) bookshop revealed that we share the same pretty damn obscure historical obsession, the 19thC whaler that eventually became the Hotel Niantic in SF. Turns out that's he working on a book, has 100+ pages of research that he's going to send me, and he's throwing in an original square nail from the hull excavation he worked on back in 1978. Even by the higher than normal standard of weird coincidences that pops up in (big, used, wonderful) bookshops, this is the ha'penny in the pudding. I spotted.
Re: Frobenius compactification homeomorphs for dinner, again?
Date: Sep. 7th, 2005 02:18 am (UTC)I went to a book barn in PA once. Somewhere westsouthwest of Philly. Maybe Swarthmore territory---dunno. Got a cool book I haven't seen in a while; wonder if I gave it away.
That Montauk stuff . . . that's some stuff, alright. And the buried ships stuff---now THAT's some stuff.
Years ago I swear there was an episode of "Kolchak: The Night Stalker," or of some show I've colluded with it in my mind, in which our hero goes into the old, under-the-streets city that supposedly actually exists in some major U.S. city, and I had a vague recollection it was Seattle. There's some spooky dead/undead thing down there or something & Kolchak must investigate---I dunno. But I was fascinated by that old city underneath the new city. With the advent of The Internet, I've been able to read through all the plot summaries of that series, and there was no recognizable sign of it, but then a little googling revealed that there is an old Seattle underground.
I'm sure the tour sucks, but maybe I could sneak away from the group or something.
Of course, btw, I have no idea what I'm referring to in my custom dictionary, a good 3/4 of the time.
Re: Frobenius compactification homeomorphs for dinner, again?
Date: Sep. 7th, 2005 05:09 am (UTC)All just a desperate attempt to intrigue, yes. Thanks for tolerating my ecdysiast tendencies, at least for the moment; after two drinks it usually turns into a rude show of me trying to decide whether to post the Friendster or Myspace link. (*Hic* "I don't do this very often.." *Hic*) An artfully dropped reference to Nabokov's "Pale Fire," and an all-too-casual plug for my radio show. Then the 78rpm copy of Bird's Koko/How High the Moon. Slides of my last vacation threaten to follow. The shotput medal I won when I was 11. Bits of seaglass. Hilarity ensues.
I'm sure the tour sucks, but maybe I could sneak away from the group or something.
Subbacultcha, indeed.
Of course, btw, I have no idea what I'm referring to in my custom dictionary, a good 3/4 of the time.
A few semesters of post-multivariable math means I still remember how cool Group/Ring theory was, but couldn't explain the Prime Number Theorem to save my life. I'm still enough of a stargazer to drool over really big twin primes and the like. At least I don't bring up the string-of-9s-in pi thing (Infinite. Nonrepeating. Duh.). Mainly I enjoy struggling to keep up with people who actually know what they're talking about and the fun terminology. (*Smacks gum*) It's refined, like.
560 miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnels is a lottta miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnel
Date: Sep. 7th, 2005 04:03 pm (UTC)I had to look up "ecdysiast." Have you lost all respect for me?
Work calls; I shall check out those links, opened in other tabs, later.
Re: 560 miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnels is a lottta miles of abandoned medieval quarry tu
Date: Sep. 8th, 2005 04:05 pm (UTC)Not hardly, yo. Irreduceable modality of the visible leads to irredeemable vulgarity of the risible.
Any more big words and I'll have to increase my ramping time tonight. Thus ends my catechism.
Re: 560 miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnels is a lottta miles of abandoned medieval quarry tu
Date: Sep. 8th, 2005 04:32 pm (UTC)I'm hardcore.
Re: 560 miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnels is a lottta miles of abandoned medieval quarry tu
Date: Sep. 8th, 2005 05:37 pm (UTC)Duuuuuuude! I am -- nonironically -- in awe. I run full out at 17 over 30m and I still get the headpops on the way into the pipeline. You must have eustachian tubes of iron!
Excuse the idiot tagline, but: I am not worthy.
Re: 560 miles of abandoned medieval quarry tunnels is a lottta miles of abandoned medieval quarry tu
Date: Sep. 8th, 2005 10:15 pm (UTC)