fflo: (avengers)
[personal profile] fflo
[livejournal.com profile] upsidedownblue just posted directions to his buddy's mother bit for TV in the Kansas queer hatred resistance. kansansforfairness.org; click on "See & Hear;" check out the Kathy Dorman commercial. The preacher they've got in the second clip strikes a slightly condescending tone with his reference to some christian notion of something like "do it for the least of us," and the other parents who have an ad seem compelled to offer their certainty that sexual orientation is not a choice (don't get me started), but all in all I'm glad to see something of a fight being put up.

Not that it'll work.

Date: Apr. 1st, 2005 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
Our county was one of the very few places in Michigan that our spankin' new anti-gay state constitutional amendment didn't pass. Of course we're still subject to its provisions. The latest bad news is that the U. of Michigan doesn't seem to intend, as it said it would, to fight the decision of the state's attourney general that they're no longer allowed to offer domestic partner benefits. The ACLU has taken up the cause, though.

Maybe it's good for all this stuff to get on the books so that, uh, ... we'll have concrete targets, and point-to-able evidence of discrimination?

Date: Apr. 1st, 2005 10:00 pm (UTC)
paperkingdoms: (Default)
From: [personal profile] paperkingdoms
The part of it that really bothers me, at the moment, is that it makes *all* domestic partnership benefts illegal. Yes, I support the right of everyone to marry... but gay marriage is already illegal in KS, and we're not particularly close to being able to change that. But it's going to pass on the "gay" side of things, and affect all sorts of people. The state's largest employers *do* offer domestic partner benefits... and won't be able to anymore.

Really, I don't see what business the government has recognizing anyone's marriage... but that's another rant entirely. ;^)

Date: Apr. 1st, 2005 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fflo.livejournal.com
Yeah, my take on it is that there should be no governmental differentiation between people based on their relationship status in any way. It's not as if we need procreation to be encouraged, anyway.

And insurance should have nothing to do with relationships, or employment, either. Of course if it were up to me insurance wouldn't even exist, dangit. What a crock.

Date: Apr. 1st, 2005 10:29 pm (UTC)
paperkingdoms: (Default)
From: [personal profile] paperkingdoms
::nods::

... and I think I'm gonna stop before I'm consumed in a cloud of sarcasm. ;^)
fflo: (Default)
fflo

Hello.

CURRENTLY FEATURING
the
Postcard of the Day

(a feature involving a postcard on a day)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For another postcard thing, see
my old postcard poems tumblr or
its handy archive.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I'm currently double-posting here & at livejournal. Add me and let me know who you are, and we can read each other's protected posts.

======================

"What was once thought cannot be unthought."

-- Möbius, The Physicists

=======================

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 1516171819 20
212223242526 27
28293031   
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 04:27 pm